Georgina Chapman on Life After Harvey Weinstein

0
3
Georgina Chapman on Life After Harvey Weinstein
Georgina Chapman on Life After Harvey Weinstein

On the day in late February after I arrive at Georgina Chapman’s city home within the West Village to interview her, it’s unseasonably sizzling, practically 80 levels. I’m ushered to the parlor ground, the place, regardless that it looks like August exterior, a fireplace is roaring away. As I wait, it abruptly dawns on me that I’m sitting in Harvey Weinstein’s lounge. He bought the six-story home in 2006, the 12 months earlier than he married Chapman, and he or she has since put her stamp throughout it: black flooring and white rugs, chinoiserie, a lot of gilt and glass, hydrangeas in a vase, a Jo Malone candle burning. On a console desk are silver-framed pictures from happier occasions, principally of the couple’s kids: India and Dashiell, seven and 5. All proof of the unique occupant would seem to have been scrubbed away—apart from a big piece of artwork hanging within the hallway. On the backside, it’s signed, “For Harvey Weinstein.” The drawing is dominated by a big empty circle, subsequent to which it reads, “The moon was here.”

I had been launched to Chapman, wearing a floor-length darkish print costume, a few weeks earlier on the West Twenty-sixth Road atelier of the style firm, Marchesa, that she co-owns with Keren Craig. That day, she struck me as hyperalert: flitting round, wide-eyed and nervous, uncomfortable in her pores and skin—or lack thereof, because it had been. She talked about, nearly in passing, that she hadn’t been out in public in 5 months—not because the information broke in October of so many unbearably related accusations by so many ladies of harassment, abuse, and rape perpetrated by her husband. When she seems at this time, wearing denims, a white T-shirt, ballerina flats, and an armful of gold bracelets, she is extra relaxed, although there’s a gallows humor—a morbidity—firmly in place. Once I point out the disturbingly heat climate, she laughs and says, “Consider all of the poor vegetation which might be going to spring out after which die.”

We head downstairs to the bottom ground, the place a lot of the residing takes place: an enormous, informal, open house with a lot of shade, trendy furnishings, and stunning artwork. There’s an enormous, elegant kitchen that appears out onto a yard, and a TV room the place Sprint, on spring break, is sitting on a sectional, ensorcelled by some type of digital gadget. At 42, Chapman seems youthful. Or is it that she appears youthful? In pictures, she has usually jogged my memory of Victoria Beckham—chiseled and considerably brittle-looking. However, at this time, dressed so California-casual, her hair now lengthy and blonde, with wide-set blue eyes and advantageous options, she seems extra like a youthful Michelle Pfeiffer. Although she is English to her core, utilizing while and learnt in a thick, posh accent, she is extra goofy than I had imagined. As we sit right down to lunch—a easy unfold of veal Milanese and eggplant parmigiana—she appears a bit flustered, unable to keep up a hostess facade for too lengthy, and even to resolve the place I ought to sit.

Our assembly, in her soon-to-be ex–city home that her soon-to-be ex-husband not too long ago offered, was meant to be the second when Chapman would lastly, publicly tackle for the primary time what occurred. The night time earlier than, she had known as me pretty late, and I assumed she was going to again out. She sounded fearful, apologizing profusely, speaking quick. She was not prepared to handle something too troublesome, didn’t really feel ready. I reassured her that we might speak about her life earlier than Harvey or about Marchesa—which is precisely what we did at first.

Not lengthy after the information broke, frequent knowledge had it that no actress would ever put on a Marchesa costume once more, and no bride would ever stroll down the aisle in a robe designed by Chapman. In January, she canceled the runway present for Marchesa’s fall 2018 assortment, which fueled rumors that the model was in bother. However Chapman says she herself made the choice to not supply any garments for awards season. “We didn’t feel it was appropriate given the situation,” she says. “All the women who have been hurt deserve dignity and respect, so I want to give it the time it deserves. It’s a time for mourning, really.” However she additionally has loyal supporters. “A lot of people reached out and said, ‘Let me wear something,’ ” and Scarlett Johansson picked a Marchesa robe to put on to Might’s Met ball.

Trend now’s such a social enterprise—so many events, a lot self-presentation. Seems, Chapman has felt insecure and awkward at social capabilities for a lot of her life. She doesn’t take pleasure in being the main focus of consideration, which is without doubt one of the causes she tends to redirect focus onto others. Because the actor David Oyelowo, her buddy of 25 years, tells me, “It’s something she’s had to cultivate: the ability to try to fade into the background. That’s why, when she’s at a party, she spends a lot of time and energy making other people feel comfortable, listened to, important.”

As our lunch is winding down, I ask, nearly in passing, if Chapman actually hadn’t been out in 5 months; she appears to shrink earlier than my eyes as her mouth goes dry. “I used to be so humiliated and so damaged . . . that . . . I, I, I . . . didn’t suppose it was respectful to exit,” she says. “I thought, Who am I to be parading around with all of this going on? It’s still so very, very raw. I was walking up the stairs the other day and I stopped; it was like all the air had been punched out of my lungs.”

I ask if she’s been seeing a therapist. “I have,” she says. “At first I couldn’t, as a result of I used to be too shocked. And I someway felt that I didn’t deserve it. After which I spotted: This has occurred. I’ve to personal it. I’ve to maneuver ahead.” She takes an extended, deep breath. “There was part of me that was terribly naive—clearly, so naive. I’ve moments of rage, I’ve moments of confusion, I’ve moments of disbelief! And I’ve moments after I simply cry for my kids. What are their lives going to be?” She has been crying by most of this, and now she breaks down into sobs loud sufficient that her assistant seems with a field of tissues. “What are people going to say to them?” She is crying so onerous she has to take a second. “It’s like, they love their dad. They love him.” It’s nearly insufferable to witness, this damaged particular person in entrance of me. “I just can’t bear it for them!”

Chapman grabs a tissue and wipes her tears away—“I wasn’t prepared to say any of that!”—and lets out a deep, guttural giggle.

Issues are much less fraught when, two weeks later, I meet her at her workplace at Marchesa and he or she is surrounded by her group, simply smiling and interesting the world—or at the very least her world. One of many few working ateliers left in Manhattan, Marchesa is a surprisingly huge operation, with about 80 staff, and stitching machines whirring away. Chapman is sporting black leather-based pants—leggings, actually—with zippers on the backs of the ankles, an untucked white tuxedo shirt, and a pair of bed room slippers studded with faux pearls. Her hair is pulled off her face with a band, and he or she’s absentmindedly consuming from the bag of popcorn that’s sitting on her desk subsequent to an achingly stunning association of pale-pink and white roses.

Keren Craig is in her workplace, together with a few different girls on the design group, as they take a look at materials and swatches and temper boards searching for inspiration for the resort assortment they’re simply starting to work on. Craig is dressed very like Chapman was the day I first met her: lengthy black floral-print costume to the ground, however with creeper boots, additionally studded with faux pearls. Once I ask in the event that they bedazzled their footwear collectively, they shout “No!” in unison and crack up laughing. “They came bedazzled,” says Craig. Chapman rolls her eyes. “We don’t have time to bedazzle our shoes, unfortunately.”

The 2 girls met once they had been seventeen, throughout what the British name a basis course on the Chelsea Faculty of Artwork and Design. After stints at completely different artwork faculties, within the early 2000s they had been each residing in London. Chapman was getting work doing music movies and, in a single significantly odd job, making costumes for a feminine wrestler. “Crazy getups!” she says.

In 2004 Chapman and Craig rented a studio collectively and got here up with the identify Marchesa as a result of Craig was enthralled with the guide Infinite Selection, in regards to the eccentric fin de siècle glamour-puss Marchesa Luisa Casati. Their preliminary concept was to create a loungewear firm. Simply weeks into this new enterprise, the 2 girls had been invited to a Louis Vuitton occasion within the English countryside, and, as Craig places it, “We were like, Now that we’ve got this fashion label, we really ought to make ourselves something to wear.” They wound up seated at a desk with Isabella Blow, who was so taken with Chapman’s costume that she borrowed it to put on to the Paris couture. As soon as Blow took them underneath her wing, they began to make actual connections after which caught a collection of fortunate breaks: a sponsorship from Swarov-ski; recommendation from Jimmy Choo cofounder Tamara Mellon to concentrate on red-carpet dressing; conferences with highly effective publicists and stylists like Nanci Ryder and Rachel Zoe.

By now, Chapman was relationship Weinstein as she went forwards and backwards between London, Los Angeles, and New York, and it didn’t damage that he got here to each Marchesa present, normally with a star in tow. Marchesa managed to get a costume on Renée Zellweger for the premiere of Bridget Jones: The Fringe of Purpose in London. “The next morning,” says Craig, “she was on the cover of every single British newspaper with a picture of our dress.” At some point they bought a name from Neiman Marcus with a proposal they couldn’t refuse: to place Marchesa in a number of shops and assist with manufacturing to create a diffusion line, which turned Marchesa Notte. “In order to make that happen, I had to move to New York,” says Chapman. “I only meant to come for a few weeks, and then never left.”

If you ask about her trend inspirations, Chapman cites John Galliano and Alexander McQueen—two of probably the most theatrical, outré designers conceivable—however there’s nothing even remotely edgy about what she does. She is unapologetically romantic, clinging to a decidedly unfeminist best that there isn’t any happier second in a girl’s life than when she lastly finds that good costume. As one trend insider places it, “Georgina puts pretty girls in pretty dresses—and there’s value in that.” And Chapman has no illusions of being avant-garde. She describes Marchesa attire as “keepsakes,” to be worn “lots of times” after which hopefully handed right down to a daughter. “We’re not doing disposable fashion,” she says. “We treat each dress like a piece of jewelry, an entity unto itself, with its own journey. It’s not just one in a queue.”

That being stated, they do have bestsellers and perennial favorites. I ask Chapman about price-point candy spots. “It really depends,” she says. “One of the gowns we did last season was nearly $13,000, and we couldn’t stop selling it. And then there’s an evening gown we make a version of every year that sells for around $4,995.” Chapman runs down the corridor, grabs one, and dangles it in entrance of me. “It’s fairly horny. You’ve bought a corset, it’s off the shoulder, you get some drama across the neck with these feathers, it nips you on the waist, provides you a bosom, and also you get a little bit of leg! If you get it out, you know you’re going to really feel good in that costume.”

The system has labored for them. As not too long ago as 2016, actresses wore Marchesa extra usually than every other designer on the crimson carpet. As Christy Rilling, who fitted Michelle Obama into practically each costume she wore as First Woman, says, “Their atelier is really special. And they’ve gotten better over the years. I’ve seen what they do for the Oscars—they really make magic happen.”

One of many criticisms that has been leveled at Marchesa is that they’d have been nothing with out Harvey Weinstein, who, folks have claimed, bullied stars into sporting his spouse’s attire. “They absolutely had a push from Harvey,” says Chapman’s buddy the author Neil Gaiman. “But you cannot hype something from nothing and make it last. And Harvey’s hyping worked because George is actually an artist. I’ve watched her at work and been impressed and fascinated. She has a vision, and she’s really good at it.”

One morning in early April, Chapman texts me of a younger woman in a really grown-up costume: It’s grey, with a large skirt manufactured from tulle and a silk corset, all of it lined with pink flowers. “Just found this picture of a dress I made when I was eleven! Things haven’t changed that much!!!”

Chapman was born and raised in Richmond, an prosperous suburb on the Thames about eight miles from central London. Her father, Brian Chapman, was the founding father of Percol, the primary ground-coffee firm on the cabinets to bear the Fairtrade mark. Her mom, Caroline Wonfor, was a journalist who labored for Reader’s Digest for a few years. She has a youthful brother, Edward, who’s the CEO of Marchesa, and regardless that their mother and father divorced when she was in her 20s, they’re a really close-knit group. “My father is self-made,” says Chapman. “He came from a council estate, left school at sixteen, and he built his own company with an incredible work ethic. He’s a true entrepreneur, and he’s always been deeply involved with philanthropy, a forward-thinker that way.”

She admits she had a really awkward childhood. She was born with a hip defect, “which meant that I had terrible pigeon toes, so I couldn’t walk to the top of the street without falling over. I was incredibly clumsy, and it set me back at school socially. I was always that kid who was the last to be picked for any sport because I literally couldn’t do it.” She was additionally severely dyslexic, which went undiagnosed till she was eight. “I remember going to the library and everyone else could read and I couldn’t. I had terrible anxiety. In class when they would go around and everyone had to read . . . it was just torture.”

Some unholy mixture of going to the Victoria and Albert Museum costume division at seven, seeing Princess Diana’s marriage ceremony on TV that very same 12 months, and being deeply envious of her Catholic cousins “going through all of their ceremonies in these beautiful white dresses” planted the seeds for her future. When Chapman was at boarding college—Saint David’s in Ashford, Surrey—she took up drawing and portray. Her roommate there was Andrea Remanda, now a songwriter residing in Los Angeles. “Her side of the room looked like a bomb exploded,” Remanda says. “She had a Guns N’ Roses poster, and I was into Prince. When we were in prep—forced homework time after school—she would draw sketches of what we did during the day, and they were amazing. I still have them.”

Remanda spent lots of time at Chapman’s mother and father’ home on weekends. “When we were sixteen we went clubbing one night, and she had bought a secondhand man’s blazer from Oxfam for 25 pence. She got out her sewing machine—I don’t even know how she found it in her crazy messy bedroom—and she did a few stitches and put it on, and I just couldn’t believe it! It’s my favorite outfit she’s ever worn. Everyone was like, Where did you get your dress? It looked like a Vivienne Westwood.”

Chapman was scouted by an agent when she was seventeen and modeled for just a few years, however as she places it, “It was very much to make ends meet. I had three jobs: I worked in a bar, I was working in a ski shop on Saturdays—a job I took because I could drink coffee and smoke cigarettes—and I was also waitressing. And I was a terrible waitress. I was so forgetful, I was clumsy, just the worst waitress ever.” Remanda tells me that Chapman didn’t love modeling. “Being scrutinized as you are in that industry—‘Too short for the catwalk!’ ‘You’ve got to lose weight!’—I don’t think she really wanted to be a part of all that.”

She was desirous about performing, although, and when Chapman was eighteen, she took a practice to Hull in northern England to take a look at the drama-studies division at a university there. The practice broke down for 3 hours, and whereas she waited she bought speaking to a different younger, aspiring actor who was heading the identical approach for a similar cause. It turned out to be Oyelowo, who would go on to play Martin Luther King Jr. in Selma. “Well, anyone who has seen Georgina, the first thing that hits you like a ton of bricks is how beautiful she is, and I’d be lying if I said I didn’t notice that,” he recollects. “But as we talked, I found her to be an interesting and deeply friendly person. She had none of that frostiness that could be associated with a model.”

Neither one in every of them wound up going to the drama college in Hull, however they’ve stayed buddies. “I was part of a youth theater group at the National Theatre in London,” Oyelowo recollects, “and I invited George along to be part of it. She’s a wonderful actress. I remember clearly thinking that she had a very real career ahead of her had she wanted it.” A few years later, Chapman invited Oyelowo to an artwork exhibition at her school. “A lot of the drawings were of fashion, and her work really stood out,” he says. “I was blown away.” A lot in order that Oyelowo requested Chapman to make the costumes for The Love of the Nightingale, a play he was performing on the Edinburgh Pageant. “And these costumes arrived, made from transparent material into which she’d sewn pieces of mirror to reflect the light. They were extraordinary. They upstaged everything else.”

One Friday afternoon in late March, I head again to Chapman’s city home for one more interview over lunch, this one served by her daughter, India, enjoying waitress. Chapman’s mom, a sublime lady with silver hair in a shag reduce, is visiting from London: She comes usually nowadays and spends lengthy stretches, serving to out with India and Sprint. “She’s such a happy-go-lucky person,” says Chapman, “so she always lifts the mood and the spirits.”

When the one-two punch of the entire allegations towards Weinstein landed in early October—first the New York Instances investigation, adopted by the way more damning piece in The New Yorker just a few days later—Chapman was in a type of stupor. “I lost ten pounds in five days. I couldn’t keep food down.” I ask her how lengthy it took for her to soak up the data. “About two days,” she says. “My head was spinning. And it was difficult because the first article was about a time long before I’d ever met him, so there was a minute where I couldn’t make an informed decision. And then the stories expanded and I realized that this wasn’t an isolated incident. And I knew that I needed to step away and take the kids out of here.”

She fled to Los Angeles with the kids, whereas her associate, Craig, did her greatest to regular the ship. “Our friendship always comes first, so foremost, I was worried for Georgina,” Craig says. “Secondly, we have so many talented, loyal people who work for us, some who’ve been here for twelve, thirteen years, so my concern was to get to the office and get the collections out, so that people could be paid and pay their rents.”

Chapman ultimately went to London to be along with her mother and father, however first she took refuge with an previous buddy. “I kind of found myself in a first-responder capacity,” says Oyelowo. “My wife and I were right there with her two kids, and this catastrophe was unfolding in real time across the globe, literally your worst nightmare in terms of a marriage, in terms of the future of your kids and your business. And none of this was your own doing and yet you are entirely lumped into it. The thing that was the most difficult to witness was that she quite rightly took the stance of not going out there and defending herself, because there was just too much white noise and too much bile headed in her general direction. She felt, How dare I raise my head and say, ‘Oh, by the way, I’m suffering too?’ ”

Due to the size of Weinstein’s abuse and manipulations—and the lengths he allegedly went to to cowl them up—there’s a extensively held assumption of complicity on Chapman’s half. “She must have known” is what so many individuals say at dinner events. “The thing that pains me,” says her buddy the mannequin and singer Karen Elson, “is that when anybody finds out that I do know George, that’s the very first thing they are saying. Like she is someway liable for his hideous habits. Once I say, ‘Well, actually she didn’t know,’ it turns into this different judgment: ‘How might she not have recognized?’ Or: ‘Well, that’s on her if she didn’t.’ It’s so sophisticated.”

It’s sophisticated, however it’s also the oldest story within the guide. Even Chapman factors out that—placing apart the enormity of her state of affairs—girls are betrayed by their husbands each day as a result of they become not the boys their wives thought they had been. “I don’t want to be viewed as a victim,” she says, “because I don’t think I am. I am a woman in a shit situation, but it’s not unique.”

Chapman first met Weinstein socially, at a celebration, they usually started relationship on and off. “I was living in England, and I had just come out of a relationship, so it was very slow.” Was it an excellent marriage? “That’s what makes this so incredibly painful: I had what I thought was a very happy marriage. I loved my life.” Requested if she was ever suspicious about his habits, she says, “Absolutely not. Never.” For one factor, he traveled consistently. “And I’ve never been one of those people who obsesses about where someone is.”

It’s very troublesome now for folks to think about that there was ever something good about Harvey Weinstein. However the reality stays that earlier than the entire horrifying revelations, most individuals thought Weinstein might be an asshole and a bully, however they didn’t suppose he was a monster. There’s all the time that beauty-and-the-beast thriller: What does she see in him? Once I ask Chapman what the preliminary attraction was, she says, “Effectively, he’s an exquisite father to my youngsters. However initially? He’s charismatic. He’s an extremely shiny, very realized man. And really charitable. He paid for a buddy of mine’s mom, who had breast most cancers, to go to a high physician. He was superb like that. He is superb like that. That’s the robust a part of this . . . this black-and-white factor . . . life isn’t like that.” Once I inform her buddy of the couple’s advised me that Weinstein gave Chapman confidence, she says, “Yes. Absolutely. He was a wonderful partner to me. He was a friend and a confidant and a supporter. Yes, he’s a big personality. . . . And . . . but . . . I don’t know. I wish I had the answers. But I don’t.”

Once I ask the individuals who have recognized Chapman the longest what they considered her marriage, the frequent thread is how stunned they had been by it—however for very completely different causes. “I first met him at a polo match,” says Remanda, “and I had no idea who he was. I know George very well, and she’d had, like, two boyfriends before Harvey. So my initial reaction was, Whoa. He’s older, he’s brash, he’s American. Who is he? We sat down and I think we laughed, belly-laughed, falling off our chairs, for two hours. I thought, She’s going to marry this guy.”

Oyelowo additionally vividly remembers the day he met Harvey. “I used to be in my automotive on Mulholland Drive, and I bought a name from George. She stated, ‘Come to Shutters on the Beach; I want you to meet my new boyfriend.’ George was there, and the very well-known producer Harvey Weinstein was there, and I used to be nonetheless ready for the boyfriend to emerge till it type of turned evident: Oh, this is who she meant! And I will likely be 100 p.c sincere with you: I used to be very skeptical. However as time went on, as they bought married, had kids, there was no approach of denying that this was a real couple.’”

Final summer time Chapman bought to know Huma Abedin, just a few months earlier than the information of the allegations about Weinstein broke, throughout play dates between their sons. Now they’re supertight. “We just . . . bonded,” Abedin says and lets out a darkish giggle. “In allll sorts of the way. This specific membership, sarcastically, it’s not such a small one: girls who’ve needed to endure it in such a public approach, girls like Georgina and me. Individuals don’t really feel sorry for us; you don’t get that empathy. Individuals suppose you’re stunning, you’re skinny, you’re wealthy, you’re photographed on the crimson carpet, and also you get caught on this class. There’s a lot extra depth past all that with Georgina.”

Over the summer time, Abedin got here to see that depth. “You look at her from the outside, if you don’t know her, and you think, She’s perfect,” says Abedin. “She could be a model for the clothes she designs. But when you go to the house, she opens the door without any makeup on, and she’s stunning, and she’s funny and goofy with her children—who are clearly the most important people in her life. She’s at the stove making chicken fingers and French fries, and she’s one of the realest people I know. There’s nothing entitled about her. You believe she is someone who works really hard at being a good and present mom, and doing her job really well.”

A buddy of Chapman’s advised me that, due to the divorce, cash, the youngsters, Georgina is in common contact with Harvey. I ask her, “Is there anything you can say about his state of mind?” “Well,” she replies with a roll of the eyes, “not really. Clearly when I was married to him I didn’t know anything about his state of mind, so I’m probably not the best person to ask.”

Chapman’s shut circle is rallying round her and hoping she could have a contemporary begin. “What I want for Georgina,” says Elson, “and it’s going to take time, and it’s impossible to come out unscathed, but let this be a moment in her life where she realizes that this is what made her. This is what made her a woman.” Once I ask Chapman if there’s something she will be able to say about her funds, now a lot modified, and her future, she replies, “I’m just living moment to moment. Is it difficult? Of course. But one adjusts. Is it going to be for the worse? Maybe not.”

On the day I visited her workplace, I observed that Chapman stored checking her telephone, like she was ready for information. Seems, she was: She had put a bid on a home in upstate New York—a farm—and hoped to seek out out if the bid was accepted. “Fingers crossed,” she stated. With the sale of all of the household properties—within the Hamptons, Connecticut, and the West Village—Chapman is attempting to get herself and the kids located. “As soon as this happened, I had this crazy vision: I know what I need to do. I need to move to a farm upstate. My daughter loves riding; my son responds to animals. I need to build a farm.”

Certainly, when the youngsters got here in after college. Sprint was carrying an infinite stuffed giraffe, and India was galloping in like a horse. “She’s obsessed,” says Chapman. “And when she’s not with a horse she’s pretending to be a horse. I’ve had to have a look at my life, and perhaps I’m going to create one thing higher for my kids out of this.” The farm, she says, is “rambling, it’s magical, it’s private, down a long driveway. And it’s connected to horse trails, so you can just ride off of the property. I promised the kids donkeys and goats.”

Chapman finds out that I reside in Woodstock, New York, and brings up Neil Gaiman, who additionally has a home there. They met when she employed him to write down the screenplay for a ten-minute brief she directed in 2013; Gaiman had collaborated with Weinstein on Hayao Miyazaki’s Princess Mononoke. “Neil still possesses that magical quality of having a child’s imagination,” she says. “When you see the way that he works and the way that he thinks, it just reminds me of how one thought when one was younger—that sense of endless possibility, just pure . . . untrapped creativity.” The phrase untrapped hung within the air.

In contrast to different buddies of Chapman’s, Gaiman did really fear about her being married to Weinstein. “One reason is that I watched the person he tried to be when he was around her—which was sort of, at least to some degree, uxorious—which was not the person that he tried to be the rest of the time. But I never felt that there was anything going on other than that Georgina was actually in love with him. There’s that point where Harvey stops being a person and becomes a cultural phenomenon, though it is worth reminding people that there are human beings here. And that one of those human beings could be affable and charming if he wished to be and also bullying and deceitful. And he was obviously very good at this.” He pauses for an extended whereas and says, lastly, “She’s a good person who married a bad person. Or, if you want to be less judgmental, she’s a good person who married a person who did some terrible things. And who now has to make a go of it on her own. And I know she can. And I’m sure she will.”

On this story:
Sittings Editor: Tabitha Simmons.
Hair: Benoit Moeyaert; Make-up: Gucci Westman.
Set Design: Mary Howard.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here